When Nokia’s stock soared 22% in a day over AI concepts, and Microsoft’s OpenAI investment became a $135 billion goldmine, should we feel excited or vigilant?
This week’s capital markets outpaced sci-fi. Nokia, once known for “walnut-crushing” phones, saw its stock jump 22% daily after NVIDIA’s $1 billion AI investment—proof the AI wave lifts even “vintage brands.”

More striking: Microsoft’s early
13billion+OpenAIinvestmentnowvaluesat135 billion (three times Iceland’s annual GDP). Post-restructuring, the “benefit humanity”-focused AI giant nears a $500 billion valuation.

A Fantasy of Valuation vs. Revenue
U.S. stocks have surged: S&P 500, Dow Jones, and NASDAQ hit intraday highs. Tech leads—NVIDIA rose nearly 5% in a day, Microsoft climbed ~2%, and both Apple and Microsoft briefly topped $4 trillion in market cap.
But beneath the hype, data tells another story.
Post-restructuring, OpenAI’s non-profit foundation holds just 26% stake, while Microsoft (27%) is the top shareholder. Despite a multinational-level valuation, the firm made only $4.3 billion in H1 2025—over 116x valuation-to-revenue, unthinkable in traditional industries.
Global AI venture capital hit $121.9 billion in H1 2025 (53% of total global VC). Yet MIT reports 95% of AI firms haven’t turned commercial profits—creating a “rampant investment, muted returns” cycle.
Worse is “industrial chain idling”: 37% of $400 billion global AI infrastructure investment circulates within the chain. A single broken link could trigger a collapse.
Is Nokia’s “Second Spring” a Transformation or Hype?
NVIDIA’s Nokia investment made “veteran users” say “my youth is back,” but Nokia is no longer a phone giant—it’s a communications equipment firm. The $1 billion funds Nokia’s AI plans, and the pair will co-develop 6G.
Whether this is real transformation or market hype needs time to verify. Notably, as capital chases AI, gold corrected—spot gold and gold futures fell below $4,000. “Abandon gold for AI” signals capital’s enthusiasm for tech revolution.
OpenAI’s Restructuring: Drifting From Its Original Mission
OpenAI completed restructuring this Tuesday, becoming a for-profit entity controlled by a non-profit. The year-long legal battle ended.
Under the new structure: non-profit OpenAI Foundation controls the OpenAI Group public benefit firm. The foundation has 26% of the for-profit arm, Microsoft holds ~27% ($135 billion value), and 47% goes to other investors and employees.
This seems to balance R&D funding needs and “benefit humanity” goals, but flaws exist.
The 2019 “100x profit cap” for the for-profit subsidiary was changed to “dynamic adjustment” in restructuring. The public benefit firm’s legal framework allows higher profit shares.
Microsoft’s deep tie-up shows capital dominance. Per the new deal, OpenAI will buy $250 billion of Azure cloud services, and Microsoft gets OpenAI’s model IP rights until 2032—even if OpenAI achieves AGI.
Elon Musk’s opposition isn’t baseless. The OpenAI co-founder’s $97.4 billion acquisition offer was rejected, and his lawsuit claims “commercialization violates the founding agreement.” While the foundation says it retains decision-making power, 26% stake’s ability to resist capital’s short-term return demands is doubtful.
Chip Giants Validate the “Water Seller First” Law in AI
The AI boom benefits not just algorithm firms but hardware makers. SK Hynix’s Q3 operating profit jumped 62% to 11.38 trillion won (~$7.94 billion)—a record high.
As NVIDIA’s major memory chip supplier, strong AI-driven memory demand fueled its profits—like the gold rush: miners may not profit, but shovel sellers do.
NVIDIA’s P/E ratio hit 51x when its market cap topped $4 trillion; Super Micro Computer’s P/E exceeded 800x after a 3x annual stock surge—far beyond traditional value metrics.
Even PayPal joins the AI trend, partnering with OpenAI to integrate services into ChatGPT. No one wants to miss the AI wave.
Bubble or New Era? Market Divisions Intensify
Enthusiasm aside, doubts persist. Bank of America’s survey calls the AI bubble the top “tail risk” for investors, while Goldman Sachs says AI will add $20 trillion to the U.S. economy.
The divide lies in “value realization cycle” views. Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood argues: “If AI expectations hold, we’re at the start of a tech revolution.”
Regardless, two trends are clear:
First, infrastructure investment dividends fade. 2025 tech giant capex rose 40% YoY, but Wall Street is cutting holdings in heat dissipation and chips. This follows tech transformation rules: enablers profit first, value finally settles at the application level.
Second, vertical implementation is key. Unlike OpenAI’s “comprehensive” approach, DeepSeek penetrates vertical scenarios via low-cost strategies. Tencent used AI to boost ad matching accuracy (20% marketing revenue growth); Alibaba’s AI products saw 7 straight quarters of triple-digit growth. These prove AI’s value shifts from “demonstration brilliance” to “solving practical problems.”
When capital cools, we’ll see AI’s true face. OpenAI’s restructuring is a stone in the AI lake, creating far-reaching ripples.
Behind
500billionvaluationiscapital’sAGIfantasy;4.3 billion revenue reminds us of tech implementation hardships. If AI changes the world, everyone should benefit, not just watch. After all, tech’s true value lies in improving ordinary people’s lives.